NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1392 MHz versus 775 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 66.82 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 192
- 3.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,138 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1536 MB
- 5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 versus 1274
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 versus 266
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 4769
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 13.598
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 404.618
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 1.227
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 44.123
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 1857
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 3275
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 1857
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 3275
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 versus 30 May 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1392 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.82 GTexel / s versus 24.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1536 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 versus 1274 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 versus 266 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 4769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 44.123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 3275 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- 178.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1250 MHz versus 7 GB/s
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.333 versus 24.676
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz versus 7 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 versus 24.676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 1274 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 266 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 4769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 13.598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 404.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 1.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 25.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 44.123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 | 30 May 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 487 | 1144 |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1392 MHz | 775 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.82 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7 GB/s | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |