NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 773 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 732.046
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 5.453
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 17.725
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 217.357
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6291
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3332
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6291
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3332

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• 2.2x more pipelines: 1664 vs 768
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6692 vs 5373
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 355
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 18143
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 vs 54.188
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3579
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3579
• Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2302 vs 2219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5373 6692
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 683
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	18143 18372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 217.357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2219 2302

Compare specifications (specs)