NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 475 MHz
• 16.8x more texture fill rate: 255.8 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
• 9.5x more pipelines: 2432 vs 256
• 16.8x better floating-point performance: 8,186 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.9x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2808 MHz
• 9.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14693 vs 1479
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 874 vs 379
• 11x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55399 vs 5044
• 13.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 13.345
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1797.792 vs 306.122
• 9.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 1.552
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.444 vs 20.453
• 26.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 39.651
• 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 2079
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3638 vs 3472
• 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 2079
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3638 vs 3472

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 142 Watt vs 180 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14693 1479
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	874 379
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55399 5044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.11 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1797.792 306.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.071 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.444 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1035.984 39.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3350

Compare specifications (specs)