NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1114 MHz
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 255.8 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 8,186 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14697 vs 11770
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 877 vs 725
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55390 vs 39571
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 12.895
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 768.171
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13738
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13738

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

• Around 26% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2432
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 vs 182.11
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 vs 1797.792
• 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 vs 26.444
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3638
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3638

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14697 11770
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	877 725
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55390 39571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.11 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1797.792 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.071 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.444 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1035.984 768.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16128 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3638 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3356

Compare specifications (specs)