NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 3.7x more texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
• 3.7x better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
• 2.2x more maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 7008 MHz
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 6957
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 630
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 22896
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 113.416
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 vs 1414.794
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 6.736
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 417.823
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3316
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 25.833
• Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 2231

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	18598 6957
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	937 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	67670 22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	205.837 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2406.499 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.591 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.833 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1002.573 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15019 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2231 2958

Compare specifications (specs)