NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M vs ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M and ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 525 MHz
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 16.1 billion / sec vs 2.1 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 192 vs 40
- 12.3x better floating-point performance: 518.4 gflops vs 42 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 15.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1214 vs 77
- 24.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 136
- 24.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 136
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 1 January 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 525 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion / sec vs 2.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops vs 42 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1214 vs 77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 136 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 262 vs 258
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 vs 258 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1214 | 77 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 258 | 262 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4263 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 136 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | ATI Radeon HD 2350 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
| Code name | GF106 | RV610 |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 1 January 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1223 | 1226 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 525 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 42 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion / sec | 2.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2350 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 275
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4860
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6510
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
