NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 518.4 gflops vs 345.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 171 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1213 vs 525
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 109
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3328
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 5 March 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops vs 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1213 vs 525 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 16.1 billion / sec
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 16.1 billion / sec |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1213 | 525 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 109 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4119 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.965 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF106 | G80 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 5 March 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1231 | 1234 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Price now | $179.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 171 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |