NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 63% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 48.0 billion / sec
- Environ 26% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,585 gflops versus 1,256 gflops
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3351 versus 2717
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 versus 371
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 versus 18.251
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 versus 1.9
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 versus 3383
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 versus 3383
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 versus 1 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec versus 48.0 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops versus 1,256 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3351 versus 2717 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 versus 371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 versus 18.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 versus 1.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 versus 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 versus 3383 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 768
- Environ 34% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 134 Watt
- 300x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10758 versus 9566
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 665.068 versus 561.43
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 versus 30.868
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.895 versus 51.009
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 versus 3426
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 3242
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 versus 3426
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 3242
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 960 versus 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 134 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10758 versus 9566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 versus 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 versus 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 versus 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 versus 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 versus 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 3242 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3351 | 2717 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9566 | 10758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | 18.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | 1.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 3334 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 26 March 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 836 | 838 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 600 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | None |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |