NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 45.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 3754
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3667
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 3754
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3667
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 vs 17 May 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec vs 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 336 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- 800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2755 vs 2527
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 410
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9103 vs 7973
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 vs 23.168
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 vs 592.345
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 vs 2.141
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 vs 28.29
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.233 vs 47.404
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2755 vs 2527 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 vs 410 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9103 vs 7973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 vs 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 vs 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 vs 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 vs 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 vs 47.404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 | 2755 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 431 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7973 | 9103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | 25.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | 2.201 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | 30.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 9 October 2012 | 17 May 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 876 | 877 |
| Price now | $169.99 | $353.59 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | 10.61 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 810 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | 99 °C |
| Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 billion / sec | 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (21 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
| SLI options | 2-Way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
