NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 928 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 30% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 billion / sec versus 45.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 336
- Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,425 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 3754
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 3667
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 3754
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 3667
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 9 October 2012 versus 17 May 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec versus 45.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 336 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 versus 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 versus 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 3332 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- 800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 versus 2528
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 433 versus 411
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8351 versus 7979
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 versus 23.168
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 versus 592.345
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.201 versus 2.141
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 versus 28.29
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.233 versus 47.404
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 versus 2528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 433 versus 411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8351 versus 7979 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 versus 23.168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 versus 592.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.201 versus 2.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 versus 28.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 versus 47.404 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 | 2756 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 | 433 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7979 | 8351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | 25.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | 623.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | 30.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 | 62.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK106 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 9 October 2012 | 17 May 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 878 | 879 |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $353.59 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | 10.61 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz | 810 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | 99 °C |
Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec | 45.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 8.25" (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
Options SLI | 2-Way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
SLI |