NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 672 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 10.8 billion / sec
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 478
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 91
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 vs 2171
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 4.85
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 195.796
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.561
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 vs 9.109
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.499 vs 16.727
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 960
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 2210
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2701
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 960
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 2210
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2701
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 672 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 10.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 258.05 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 vs 2171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 vs 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 vs 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 vs 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 vs 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 vs 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2701 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 180x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 2171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK106 | GF108 |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 1003 | 1503 |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 672 MHz |
CUDA cores | 384 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |