NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 720 MHz
• Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 345
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1263
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 2409
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 3111
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1263
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 2409
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 3111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 33.9 billion / sec
• 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3252 vs 1753
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9400 vs 4490
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 vs 12.582
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 vs 364.463
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 1.254
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 18.386
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 vs 23.499

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1753 3252
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	365 345
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4490 9400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.582 28.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.463 879.575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.254 2.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.386 40.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.499 99.75
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 2409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3111

Compare specifications (specs)