NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 720 MHz
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 versus 345
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1263
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 2409
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 3111
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1263
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 2409
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 3111
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 4 June 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 720 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 versus 345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3111 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 80.6 billion / sec versus 33.9 billion / sec
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 384
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,038 gflops versus 812.5 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 360x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3252 versus 1753
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9400 versus 4490
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 versus 12.582
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 versus 364.463
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 versus 1.254
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 versus 18.386
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 versus 23.499
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec versus 33.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops versus 812.5 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3252 versus 1753 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9400 versus 4490 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 versus 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 versus 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 versus 23.499 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1753 | 3252 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 345 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4490 | 9400 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3111 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 4 June 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $310.50 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1044 | 1047 |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | $499.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | 8.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 720 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 80.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | None |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |