NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 768 vs 720
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 1,008.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2004 vs 1042
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 275
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.832 vs 8.039
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.935 vs 0.867
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2100
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2100

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 863 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 vs 520.747
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 vs 19.952
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 vs 43.535
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2004 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	289 275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.832 8.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	520.747 544.041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.935 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.952 20.664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.535 91.074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3188 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3275 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3188 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3275 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3358

Compare specifications (specs)