NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon HD 7470M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon HD 7470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
  • Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 863 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 9.2x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
  • 4.8x more pipelines: 768 vs 160
  • 5.5x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2010 vs 408
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7240 vs 3322
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1422
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3074
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1422
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3074
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 May 2013 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
Boost clock speed 863 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate 55.23 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 160
Floating-point performance 1,326 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2010 vs 408
Geekbench - OpenCL 7240 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3275 vs 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 vs 3074
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3275 vs 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 vs 3074

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470M

  • 10.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 393 vs 289
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 393 vs 289

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2010
408
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
289
393
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7240
3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3275
1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3074
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3275
1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3333
3074
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M AMD Radeon HD 7470M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2010 408
PassMark - G2D Mark 289 393
Geekbench - OpenCL 7240 3322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3275 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 3074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3275 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 3074
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 759 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M AMD Radeon HD 7470M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK106 Seymour
Launch date 30 May 2013 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 1033 1035
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 863 MHz 800 MHz
Core clock speed 850 MHz 750 MHz
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 1,326 gflops 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 160
Texture fill rate 55.23 GTexel / s 6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 7 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
SLI options 1

API support

DirectX 12 API 11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3 / GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA
Verde Drivers