NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon HD 7470M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon HD 7470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 863 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 9.2x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 768 vs 160
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2010 vs 408
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7240 vs 3322
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1422
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3074
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1422
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3074
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 863 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2010 vs 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7240 vs 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3074 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470M
- 10.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 393 vs 289
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 393 vs 289 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | AMD Radeon HD 7470M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2010 | 408 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | 393 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7240 | 3322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3074 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | AMD Radeon HD 7470M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK106 | Seymour |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1033 | 1035 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 863 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 750 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 7 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers |