NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 720 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 863 MHz versus 758 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 versus 1263
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 versus 2409
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 3111
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 versus 1263
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 versus 2409
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 3111
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 4 June 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 720 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 863 MHz versus 758 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3111 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Environ 46% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 80.6 billion / sec versus 55.23 GTexel / s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 768
- Environ 54% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,038 gflops versus 1,326 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3239 versus 1998
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 versus 289
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9778 versus 7244
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 versus 8.832
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 versus 520.747
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 versus 0.731
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 versus 19.952
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 versus 43.535
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec versus 55.23 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops versus 1,326 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3239 versus 1998 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 versus 289 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9778 versus 7244 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 versus 8.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 versus 520.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 versus 0.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 versus 19.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 versus 43.535 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 | 3239 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 | 343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7244 | 9778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 | 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 | 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.731 | 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 | 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 | 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3111 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 4 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1059 | 1060 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 863 MHz | 758 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 720 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,326 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s | 80.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | large |
Options SLI | 1 | 2-way |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |