NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 5x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 5.1x more pipelines: 2304 vs 448
• 4x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 3176
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 362
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23233 vs 11024
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 57.735 vs 26.055
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 901.157
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 vs 2.99
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.323 vs 89.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 238 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 vs 37.407
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3714
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3358
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3714
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7986 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	23233 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.735 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1269.688 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.505 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.407 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.323 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 9064

Compare specifications (specs)