NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 versus NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 863 MHz versus 575 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 160.5 billion / sec versus 32.2 GTexel / s
- 5.1x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 448
- 4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,156 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 versus 3176
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 versus 362
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 23233 versus 11024
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 57.735 versus 26.055
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 versus 901.157
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 versus 2.99
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.323 versus 89.869
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 May 2013 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 863 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.5 billion / sec versus 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 versus 3176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 versus 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23233 versus 11024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 versus 26.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 versus 901.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 versus 2.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 versus 89.869 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 238 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 versus 37.407
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 versus 3714
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 versus 3358
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 versus 3714
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 versus 3358
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 versus 37.407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 | 3176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23233 | 11024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | 26.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | 901.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | 2.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | 41.654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | 89.869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 9064 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK110 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 23 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 451 | 578 |
| Prix maintenant | $740.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 863 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2304 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.5 billion / sec | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 248 mm |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.4 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 GTO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
