NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 9.2x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 13.8 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 1536 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 14.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3814 vs 264
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 283
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 951
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 951
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 12 October 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 24 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 vs 264 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 vs 283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 951 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 122 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 | 264 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 | 283 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 951 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
| Code name | GK104 | G71 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 12 October 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 737 | 1065 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-III |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 44.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 700 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| CineFX 4.0 | ||
| Intellisample 4.0 | ||
| PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon 630
