NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and Intel Iris Graphics 6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 vs 900
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 313
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16728 vs 3025
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 1404
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 1139
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3331
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 1404
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 1139
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3331
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 August 2015 vs 5 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 vs 900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 vs 313 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 vs 3025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 90 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 | 900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 313 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 | 3025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 105 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Broadwell GT3 |
Launch date | 20 August 2015 | 5 January 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Place in performance rating | 547 | 1085 |
Price now | $194.44 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 300 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.6 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
Quick Sync |