NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 660 MHz
- Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 2x 422.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2581 vs 478
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 187
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 1 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 2x 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2581 vs 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 187 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 10.56 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.56 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2581 | 478 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9740 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | M88 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 1 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 878 | 881 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 660 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 2x 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 2x 10.56 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB / s | 2x 54.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |