NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1057 MHz vs 947 MHz
  • 384.4x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz
  • Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 vs 43410
  • Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 117.322
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 11.12
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 vs 120.942
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 vs 628.757
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 8729
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 7055
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3353
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 8729
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 7055
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 24 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1057 MHz vs 947 MHz
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 50663 vs 43410
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 165.993 vs 117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.641 vs 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 135.641 vs 120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 745.481 vs 628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 vs 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 vs 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 vs 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 vs 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X

  • Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8526 vs 6831
  • Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 755 vs 403
  • Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 vs 1980.866
  • 9.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3932 vs 421
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2816 vs 2048
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8526 vs 6831
PassMark - G2D Mark 755 vs 403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2460.464 vs 1980.866
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3932 vs 421

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6831
8526
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
403
755
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
50663
43410
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
165.993
117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1980.866
2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.641
11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
135.641
120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
745.481
628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
421
3932
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark 6831 8526
PassMark - G2D Mark 403 755
Geekbench - OpenCL 50663 43410
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 165.993 117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1980.866 2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.641 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 135.641 120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 745.481 628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 421 3932

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 290X

Essentials

Architecture Ampere GCN 2.0
Code name GA107 Hawaii
Launch date 2021 24 October 2013
Place in performance rating 248 284
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $549

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1057 MHz 947 MHz
Core clock speed 712 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2048 2816
Pixel fill rate 42.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s 176.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Floating-point performance 5,632 gflops
Stream Processors 2560
Transistor count 6,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.2 12
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 320 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)