NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1057 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 384.4x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 vs 43410
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 117.322
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 11.12
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 vs 120.942
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 vs 628.757
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 8729
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 7055
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3353
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 8729
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 7055
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 24 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s vs 176.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 vs 43410 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 vs 117.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 vs 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 vs 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 vs 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 vs 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 vs 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8526 vs 6831
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 755 vs 403
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 vs 1980.866
- 9.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3932 vs 421
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2048 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8526 vs 6831 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 755 vs 403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 vs 1980.866 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3932 vs 421 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 8526 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 755 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 43410 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 117.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 3932 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 2021 | 24 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 248 | 284 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 947 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |