NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 vs 39165
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 134.765
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 vs 1316.075
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 8.799
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 vs 94.915
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 vs 573.418
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 10959
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3358
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 10959
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3715
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3358
• Around 38% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 421 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 712 MHz
• Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1057 MHz
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 6831
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 403

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6831 7881
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	403 564
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50663 39165
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.993 134.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980.866 1316.075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.641 8.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.641 94.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	745.481 573.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	421 305

Compare specifications (specs)