NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 50663 versus 39165
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 versus 134.765
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 versus 1316.075
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 versus 8.799
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 versus 94.915
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 745.481 versus 573.418
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 versus 10959
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 versus 3358
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 versus 10959
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 versus 3358
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 421 versus 305
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 30 April 2019 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 versus 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 versus 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 versus 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 versus 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 versus 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 versus 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 versus 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 versus 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 712 MHz
- Environ 58% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1057 MHz
- 5.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 6831
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 403
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 712 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1057 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 6831 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 403 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6831 | 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50663 | 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA107 | TU107 |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 30 April 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 248 | 376 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1057 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 712 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.65 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
