NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22431 vs 21789
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1000 vs 935
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 452.561 vs 394.035
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 5461.22
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 184.548 vs 173.697
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 23659
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3718
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3358
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 23659
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3718
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22431 vs 21789 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 vs 935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 vs 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 vs 173.697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138598 vs 124736
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 vs 40.794
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1634.218
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14629 vs 13597
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138598 vs 124736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 vs 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1634.218 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14629 vs 13597 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22431 | 21789 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 124736 | 138598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.794 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1634.218 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13597 | 14629 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU102 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 43 | 87 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 317.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |