NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 14% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 220 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22409 versus 21785
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 935
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 452.561 versus 394.035
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 5461.22
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 184.548 versus 173.697
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 23659
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3718
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3358
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 23659
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3718
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22409 versus 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 versus 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 versus 173.697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 124848
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 versus 40.794
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1634.218
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14606 versus 13611
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 124848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 versus 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1634.218 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 versus 13611 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22409 | 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 124848 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.794 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1634.218 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13611 | 14606 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 41 | 83 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.31 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | |
Pixel fill rate | 165.6 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |