NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
• 2.6x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2304
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 85209
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 232.933
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 3728.135
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 24.872
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 136.223
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1011.233
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 20206
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3714
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3359
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 20206
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3714
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3359
• Around 69% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 1873

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

• Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 220 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	123479 85209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	453.922 232.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5803.174 3728.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.757 24.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	182.055 136.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1664.554 1011.233
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31716 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13566 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31930 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3163 1873

Compare specifications (specs)