NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

versus

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
Environ 49% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1005 MHz
Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz
Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s
2.6x plus de pipelines: 5888 versus 2304
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 85209
Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 232.933
Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 3728.135
Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 24.872
Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 136.223
Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1011.233
Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 20206
3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3714
9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3359
Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 20206
3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3714
9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3359
Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 1873

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020 versus 13 November 2018
Vitesse du noyau	1500 MHz versus 1005 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	317.4 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s
Pipelines	5888 versus 2304
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 12 nm
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	123479 versus 85209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	453.922 versus 232.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	5803.174 versus 3728.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	40.757 versus 24.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	182.055 versus 136.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1664.554 versus 1011.233
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	31716 versus 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	13566 versus 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	31930 versus 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	31716 versus 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	13566 versus 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	31930 versus 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3163 versus 1873

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Environ 38% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 220 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	160 Watt versus 220 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

123479

85209

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

453.922

232.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5803.174

3728.135

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.757

24.872

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

182.055

136.223

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1664.554

1011.233

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31716

20206

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13566

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31930

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31716

20206

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13566

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31930

3359

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3163

1873

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	22253
PassMark - G2D Mark	999
Geekbench - OpenCL	123479	85209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	453.922	232.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	5803.174	3728.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	40.757	24.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	182.055	136.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1664.554	1011.233
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	31716	20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	13566	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	31930	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	31716	20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	13566	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	31930	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3163	1873

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Nom de code	GA104	TU104
Date de sortie	1 Sep 2020	13 November 2018
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$499	$899
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	44	211
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Génération GCN		Quadro RTX
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1725 MHz	1545 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1500 MHz	1005 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)	222.5 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)	14.24 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	20.31 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS
Pipelines	5888	2304
Pixel fill rate	165.6 GPixel/s	98.88 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	317.4 GTexel/s	222.5 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	220 Watt	160 Watt
Compte de transistor	17400 million	13600 million
Render output units		64
Texture Units		144
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Facteur de forme	Dual-slot
Hauteur	112 mm (4.4 inches)
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	242 mm, 9.5 inches	9.5 inches (241 mm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	550 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 12-pin	1x 8-pin
Largeur	112 mm, 4.4 inches
Soutien API
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	448.0 GB/s	416.0 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 bit	256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective	1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR6