NVIDIA Quadro K1000M versus AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and AMD Radeon HD 7670M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 779 versus 473
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 versus 91
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1717 versus 1416
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 versus 2.47
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2012 versus 17 February 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 779 versus 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 versus 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1717 versus 1416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.636 versus 2.47 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7670M
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 14.4 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 192
- Environ 76% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 576.0 gflops versus 326.4 gflops
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 210.901 versus 115.549
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 versus 1162
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2194 versus 1695
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 2297
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 versus 1162
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2194 versus 1695
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 2297
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.4 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 576.0 gflops versus 326.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.901 versus 115.549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2194 versus 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 2297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 versus 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2194 versus 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 2297 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 779 | 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1717 | 1416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.636 | 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 115.549 | 210.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2297 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2297 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK107 | Thames |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2012 | 17 February 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.90 | $629.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1402 | 1404 |
Prix maintenant | $149.90 | $629.99 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.18 | 1.48 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 326.4 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.6 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 20 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, (GDDR5) |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |