NVIDIA Quadro K1100M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 144
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 542.2 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 56% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2800 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1087 versus 552
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 171
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3056 versus 2565
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 versus 5.332
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 versus 0.635
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 versus 10.932
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 versus 800
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 versus 800
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 542.2 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1087 versus 552 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3056 versus 2565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 versus 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 versus 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 versus 10.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 versus 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 versus 800 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 174.555
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 versus 16.3
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 861
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 versus 1443
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 861
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 1443
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 174.555 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 versus 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 versus 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 versus 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 1443 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1087 | 552 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3056 | 2565 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | 10.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | 22.728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | 2418 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1446 | 1449 |
| Prix maintenant | $79 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 542.2 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.59 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 44.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K1100M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
