NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs AMD FirePro V5900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and AMD FirePro V5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 1238
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 351
• 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 2880
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 8.167
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 409.102
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 0.772
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 vs 20.064
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 66.259
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 1713
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 1713

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900

• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2091 vs 1577
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 1671
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2091 vs 1577
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V5900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3572 1238
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	548 351
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12020 2880
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.695 8.167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.094 409.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.205 0.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.455 20.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.26 66.259
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 2091
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 5078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 2091
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 5078

Compare specifications (specs)