NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000M and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 151 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.46 vs 1.309
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3855 vs 2996
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 3710
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3354
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3855 vs 2996
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 3710
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 58.0 GTexel / s vs 48.08 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 960
• Around 61% better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2305 vs 1915
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 298
• 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 5827
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.134 vs 10.054
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 676.409 vs 544.601
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.678 vs 22.103
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 36.553

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1915 2305
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	298 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5827 27733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.054 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	544.601 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.46 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.103 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.553 171.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3855 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4957 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4470 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3855 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4957 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4470 3354

Compare specifications (specs)