NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6.2x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 254 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 373
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 3977
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 19 September 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 vs 0.789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- 13.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 2x 960 vs 384
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2534 vs 2220
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 960 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2534 vs 2220 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 0.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Barts |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 19 September 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 741 |
Price now | $189.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2x 1,536.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 960 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 254 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 134.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |