NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 60 Watt
360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 vs 117

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	702 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2.4x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
Around 61% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2220
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 480
Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 6869
Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 22.112
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 297.631
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.427
Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 15.363
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 99.125
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2970
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2490
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2970
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2490

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 480
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526 vs 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463 vs 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	642.715 vs 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933 vs 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	26.532 vs 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	133.458 vs 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4843 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4843 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 2490

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2220

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

480

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6869

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22.112

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

297.631

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.427

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.363

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

99.125

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2970

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2490

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2970

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2490

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

702

117

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	2220	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	480	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	6869	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.112	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	297.631	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.427	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.363	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	99.125	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	702	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K620	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Launch date	22 July 2014	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$189.89	$149
Place in performance rating	953	707
Price now	$189.93	$299.01
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	15.23	15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	640
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	160 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		86.4 GB / s
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA