NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 80% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 59 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 380
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 39
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 10 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 59 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 vs 380 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 vs 39 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 1349
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 1349
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 1349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | ATI Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 380 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 158 | 39 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5400 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM108 | RV730 |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 10 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1425 | 1429 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 59 Watt |
Transistor count | 514 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 193 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |