NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 vs 30.523
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 vs 30.523 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1093 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 3217
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 312
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 10582
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 52.821
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 793.297
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.631
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 163.204
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 4941
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2645
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 4941
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2645
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1093 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 1,399 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 3217 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 312 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 10582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 52.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 vs 793.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 163.204 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 4941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 4941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 | 5029 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 457 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | GM107 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 586 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1093 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.72 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,300 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3450
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT600
