NVIDIA Quadro P1000 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 versus 63.74
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 31 January 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 versus 63.74 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3699 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 89.6 GTexel / s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3.5x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 512
- Environ 51% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,867 gflops versus 1,894 gflops
- 5.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 versus 15667
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 versus 832.248
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 versus 4.039
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 69.23 versus 65.117
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 245.081
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 versus 6796
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 versus 6796
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1914 versus 1591
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.6 GTexel / s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,867 gflops versus 1,894 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 versus 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 versus 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 versus 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 versus 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 versus 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 versus 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 versus 1591 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4475 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 82144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 31 January 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | $449 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 526 | 528 |
| Prix maintenant | $319.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P1000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
