NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 457
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 67.209
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 799.414
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 30.523
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 223.683
- 13x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 122
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,862 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 vs 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 vs 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 vs 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 vs 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 3685 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 vs 122 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 4500
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 15667
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 4.039
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 6796
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 6796
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 4500 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 4.039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 5029 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 457 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 7043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP107 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $109 |
| Place in performance rating | 517 | 586 |
| Price now | $319.99 | $124.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | 56.95 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,300 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850A
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
