NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1098 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 3446
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 336
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 8148
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 47.281
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 782.113
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 3.5
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 51.048
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 172.896
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 4920
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 4920
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 3 December 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1098 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,405 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 vs 3446 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 vs 8148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 vs 47.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 vs 782.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 vs 3.5 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 vs 51.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 vs 172.896 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 4920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 4920 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 3446 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 8148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 47.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 782.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 3.5 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 51.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 172.896 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 4920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 4920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 3 December 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
Place in performance rating | 517 | 700 |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1098 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |