NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 773 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 65.548
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 732.046
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 17.725
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 217.357
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 6291
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 6291
• 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 680

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

• Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1664 vs 512
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 4500
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 590
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 15667
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 vs 4.039

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 6680
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 18372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 217.357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 680

Compare specifications (specs)