NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 977 MHz
- Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 2775
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 391
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 8073
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 3854
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 3854
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 756 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 977 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,000 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 vs 2775 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 391 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 vs 8073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 3854 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 47 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | 2775 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 391 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | 8073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
| Place in performance rating | 517 | 584 |
| Price now | $319.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 977 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,000 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850A
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
