NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 290

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 947 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8740 vs 8239
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 6300
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 6300

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 February 2018 vs 5 November 2013
Core clock speed	1328 MHz vs 947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8740 vs 8239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12948 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12948 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
Around 57% better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 765 vs 448
3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 34221

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	151.5 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2560 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	4,849 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	765 vs 448
Geekbench - OpenCL	102277 vs 34221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8740

8239

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

448

765

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

34221

102277

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12948

6300

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12948

6300

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3354

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 290
PassMark - G3D Mark	8740	8239
PassMark - G2D Mark	448	765
Geekbench - OpenCL	34221	102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12948	6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12948	6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	3699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		540.645

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 290
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Code name	GP104	Hawaii
Launch date	21 February 2018	5 November 2013
Place in performance rating	341	344
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$399
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1476 MHz
Core clock speed	1328 MHz	947 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,098 gflops	4,849 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	2560
Texture fill rate	96.8 GTexel / s	151.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	7,200 million	6,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		275 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB / s	320.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)