NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD FirePro M5950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 3600 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1639 vs 1314
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3053 vs 1206
• 16.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.138 vs 1.199
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.391 vs 0.535
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.886 vs 16.137
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.858 vs 66.638
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 1528
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 2590
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 1528
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 2590

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950

• Around 88% higher pipelines: 480 vs 256
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 696.0 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 443
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 323.699 vs 318.72
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3328
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3328

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 1314
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	443 574
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 1206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.138 1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	318.72 323.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.391 0.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.886 16.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.858 66.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3354

Compare specifications (specs)