NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 13044
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 13044

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 498
Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13047 vs 10967
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69530 vs 63532
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3719
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3719
9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3361
9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3361

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	769 vs 498
PassMark - G3D Mark	13047 vs 10967
Geekbench - OpenCL	69530 vs 63532
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	30936 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	30936 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

769

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10967

13047

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

63532

69530

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

30936

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

30936

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	769
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967	13047
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532	69530
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	30936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Code name	N19E-Q1	Vega 10
Launch date	27 May 2019	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	249	120
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999
Value for money (0-100)		13.37
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1530 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	230 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	12,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready