NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 13044
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 523
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 11191
  • Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69812 vs 64287
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3719
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3719
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3361
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3361
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 815 vs 523
PassMark - G3D Mark 13932 vs 11191
Geekbench - OpenCL 69812 vs 64287
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
523
815
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11191
13932
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
64287
69812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
30936
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark 523 815
PassMark - G3D Mark 11191 13932
Geekbench - OpenCL 64287 69812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 30936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name N19E-Q1 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 229 118
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready