NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 13044
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 523
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 11191
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69812 vs 64287
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3719
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3719
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3361
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 11191 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 vs 64287 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | 815 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11191 | 13932 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64287 | 69812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 30936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N19E-Q1 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 229 | 118 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | Large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |