NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 790 vs 741
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14753 vs 13044
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14753 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 790 vs 741
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14753 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14753 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11473 vs 10143
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 186736 vs 56467
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3708
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3708
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3352
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3352
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11473 vs 10143
Geekbench - OpenCL 186736 vs 56467
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
790
741
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10143
11473
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
56467
186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14753
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14753
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
30936
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark 790 741
PassMark - G3D Mark 10143 11473
Geekbench - OpenCL 56467 186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14753 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14753 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 30936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name N19E-Q1 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 71 5
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready