NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 199223 vs 186736

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10925 vs 10341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	796 796
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10341 10925
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	199223 186736

Compare specifications (specs)