NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
3.2x more core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1150 MHz
96x more pipelines: 2304 vs 24
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 vs 241
10.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 1042
13.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 4592
10.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 1397
10.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 1397
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 878
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 878
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2227
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2227

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 1 September 2017
Core clock speed	945 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Pipelines	2304 vs 24
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	498 vs 241
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967 vs 1042
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532 vs 4592
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 2227

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt
5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 80 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 6 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

241

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10967

1042

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

63532

4592

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

1397

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

1397

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

878

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

878

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

2227

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

2227

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	241
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967	1042
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532	4592
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	2227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	2227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		31.881
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		62

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Generation 9.5
Code name	N19E-Q1	Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date	27 May 2019	1 September 2017
Place in performance rating	249	1380
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	24
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	32 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready
Quick Sync