NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 61100
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 22 February 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 vs 61100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 498
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 vs 10967
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 14496
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 14496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 498 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 vs 10967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 498 | 807 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10967 | 12900 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63532 | 61100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 249 | 221 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
IntelArc Pro A50
