NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• 1129x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2000x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 42988
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 10471
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 10471
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3695
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3695
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3338
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 945 MHz
• Around 22% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2304
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 498
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 10967

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	498 852
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10967 13758
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	63532 42988
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14496 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14496 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3338

Compare specifications (specs)