NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- 1243x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 39388
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 115.834
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 1987.633
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 10.152
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 105.263
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 597.677
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3575
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3575
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 10 November 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 39388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 39388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7811 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Ellesmere |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 10 November 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $799 |
| Place in performance rating | 211 | 316 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $539.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1243 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
