NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1243 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 179.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 39388
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 115.834
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 1987.633
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 10.152
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 105.263
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 597.677
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 10320
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3575
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 10320
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3575
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 10 November 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1243 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 179.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 39388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1188 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 4.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Vitesse du noyau | 1188 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 39388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 115.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 1987.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 10.152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 105.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 597.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 10320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7811 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Ellesmere |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 10 November 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $799 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 316 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $539.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1243 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 5,700 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,728 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
