NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 869.8x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85890 vs 55399
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 182.11
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3403.106 vs 1797.792
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 vs 14.071
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.919 vs 26.444
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 16128
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3638
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 16128
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3638
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 vs 6814
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 2 November 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85890 vs 55399 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 vs 182.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 vs 1797.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 vs 14.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 vs 26.444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 vs 6814 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2304
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 1010.818
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2432 vs 2304 |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 vs 1010.818 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85890 | 55399 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | 182.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 1797.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 14.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 26.444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 1035.984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 16128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | 6814 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14693 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 2 November 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 206 | 243 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2432 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDFirePro W9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
